Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PHILLIPS v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff: JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant: JACKSON, NALL, K. PADGETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NALL v. WARDEN
as 3:2022cv00190
Petitioner: MICHAEL NALL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NALLS v. WARDEN
as 2:2019cv00123
Petitioner: EMMETT NALLS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00035
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
NALL, f/k/a TAYLOR v. ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00389
Defendant: ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC and LVNV FUNDING, LLC
Plaintiff: DEBORAH NALL, f/k/a TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nall v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00089
Plaintiff: Warren Nall
Defendant: Zimmer Inc and Zimmer Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nall v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01755
Plaintiff: Gwendolyn Nall
Defendant: Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet U.S. Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01824
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01181
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tindal et al v. Walker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00040
Plaintiff: Mrs Lovetta Tindal and Ms Gloria Moreno
Defendant: Mr Anthony Walker , Cynthia Watts , Rayfield Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?