Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Percy et al v. Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation et al
as NYE/1:21-CV-02311
Defendant:
Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation, Milford Management, Opengate Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Percy, Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation
Percy et al v. Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02311
Defendant:
Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation, Milford Management, Opengate Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation an IRC 501(c)(3) non-profit, as Class Representatives, Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation
Respondent:
James M. Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company v. NAMIC Insurance Company, Inc.
as 3:2020cv03061
Plaintiff:
Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
NAMIC Insurance Company, Inc. and NAMIC Insurance Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GENERAL CARBIDE CORPORATION v. RUFFOLO et al
as 2:2019cv01200
Defendant:
DIE-NAMIC, INC. and DOMINIC RUFFOLO
Plaintiff:
GENERAL CARBIDE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company v. Namic Insurance Company, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00791
Plaintiff:
Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Namic Insurance Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MD DC DE Bcastr Assn, et al v. FCC, et al
as 00-1094
Petitioner:
MD/DC/DE Broadcasters Association, Alabama Broadcasters Association, Alaska Broadcasters Association and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Minority Media and Telecommunications Council, African American Media Incubator, Alliance for Community Media and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, National Cable Television Association, Inc., NAMIC, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
