Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Nance v. United States Of America
as 7:2024cv00323
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Peter Michael Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Anderson v. Cox et al
as 7:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Anderson
Defendant:
Mr. Cox, Mr. Hayes, Major Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Both v. Pacific Medical Revenue, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
John Both
Defendant:
Pacific Medical Revenue, Inc. and Ethne Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Apex Systems, Inc. v. Nance
as 3:2014cv00041
Plaintiff:
Apex Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Victor Harrison Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and Jeff Nance
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Nance v. USA
as 7:2012cv80519
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lawrence Nance
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
-gc Nance #03781-084 v. USA
as 7:1996cv00334
Petitioner:
Jimmy L. Nance #03781-084
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nance v. USA
as 7:2011cv80382
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lawrence Nance
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
