Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv03634
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
In re: William Ochadleus, et al v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 15-2194
Debtor:
In re: CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Appellant:
WILLIAM OCHADLEUS, SHELTON HAYES, SHIRLEY BERGER and others
Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14872
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Bank of America Wage and Hour Employment Practices Litigation
as 2:2010md02138
In Re:
Bank of America Wage and Hour Employment Practices Litigation and All Plaintiffs (for Lead/Liaison Counsel ONLY)
Plaintiff:
Amanda Brawner, Gynon Hamilton, LaVonda R. Edwards and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Fowler et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2008mc50774
Plaintiff:
Nancy M Fowler, Nancy M Fowler, Skipp Van Fowler and others
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Movant:
Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association and Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Fowler et al v. Hamilton Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00055
Plaintiff:
Nancy Ann Fowler, Nancy Ann Fowler, Nancy Ann Fowler and others
Defendant:
Hamilton Medical Center, Inc., Hamilton Health Care System, Inc., Thomas N. Mullen, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Aube et al v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv03377
Plaintiff:
Dolly Aube, Dolly Aube, Dolly Aube and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
