Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cross et al v. Nanos et al
as 4:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Aaron Cross and Arizona Conference of Police and Sheriffs
Defendant:
Chris Nanos and Joseph Cameron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maldonado v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Maldonado
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Chris Nanos, Aimee Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Terrence Bressi v. Pima County Board of Superviso, et al
as 22-15123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE BRESSI
Defendant / Appellee:
PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, MARK NAPIER, Pima County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, CHRISTOPHER NANOS, Former Pima County Sheriff, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09601
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wade Webb v. County of Pima, et al
as 18-16659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE TRAVIS WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF PIMA, CLARENCE DUPNIK, former Sheriff, CHRIS NANOS, former Sheriff and others
Webb v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
Wade Travis Webb
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Clarence Dupnik, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bressi v. Pima County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Terrence Bressi
Defendant:
Pima County Board of Supervisors, Mark Napier, Clarence Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rheinlander v. Lindenau et al
as 4:2017cv00409
Plaintiff:
Carly Rheinlander
Defendant:
Eric Lindenau, Chris Nanos and Pima, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
