Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Allen v. Virginia Beach Correctional Center et al
as 1:2016cv00638
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen
Defendant:
Virginia Beach Correctional Center, NaphCare and Virginia Beach Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roxanne Adams, Administrator of the Estate of Jamycheal M. Mitchell v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Adams, Administrator of the Estate of Jamycheal M. Mitchell
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Nsekenene Kolongo, MD, Renee Edwards, LCSW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart Northcraft vs. David Simmons, et al
as 1:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Stuart Northcraft
Defendant:
David Simons, Correct Care Solutions, Hampton Roads Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butts v. Emran et al
as 2:2015cv00561
Plaintiff:
Wayne Douglas Butts
Defendant:
Dr. Emran, John Doe, Nurse White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Stolley et al
as 1:2015cv00969
Plaintiff:
Marlon Terrez Mims
Defendant:
Ken Stolley, Abdul H. Jamaludeen and NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickrell, III v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv00657
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Pickrell, III
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail, City of Portsmouth, Va., NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond, Jr. v. NaphCare Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00411
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Raymond, Jr.
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc., Matt Piro and Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. NAPHCARE et al
as 2:2014cv00323
Plaintiff:
Jovaughn Baker
Defendant:
NAPHCARE and Naphcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deiulio v. NaphCare
as 2:2013cv00683
Plaintiff:
Adam Deiulio
Defendant:
NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
