Cases 31 - 40 of 111
RYALS v. MURPHREE et al
as 4:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
DELACY A RYALS
Defendant:
NATALIE MURPHREE, JOEL STANTON and Corporal EARL OSBON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Natalie Roberto
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tripp v. Paine et al
as 1:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
Leon L. Tripp
Defendant:
Natalie Paine, Peter Johnson and Richmond County Sheriff Office's Investigators
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Enforcers Protective Service, LLC.
as 1:2021cv03061
Plaintiff:
Natalie Thomas
Defendant:
Enforcers Protective Service, LLC. and Lanar Briscoe
Smith v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02866
Plaintiff:
Natalie Smith
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Georgia Voter Alliance et al v. Pitts et al
as 1:2021cv00556
Plaintiff:
Kristina M. Bernhard, Kevin McClelion, Georgia Voter Alliance and others
Defendant:
Robb Pitts, Lee Morris, Bob Ellis and others
Santry v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv00457
Defendant:
Jesse A. Harris, Mark C. Adger, Bob Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Shawn Santry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
