Cases
Madison Cawthorn v. Barbara Lynn Amalfi
as 22-1251
Plaintiff / Appellee: MADISON CAWTHORN
Appellant: BARBARA LYNN AMALFI, LAUREL ASHTON, NATALIE BARNES and others
Defendant: DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Cawthorn v. Circosta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00050
Plaintiff: Madison Cawthorn
Defendant: DAMON CIRCOSTA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE NC BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JEFF CARMON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Interested Party: Barbara Lynn Amalfi, Laurel Ashton, Natalie Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders et al v. State Farm Insurance Company et al
as 2:2007cv09019
Plaintiff: Pamela Sanders, Jane Brown, Pam Dailet and others
Defendant: State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Barnes et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
as 2:2007cv04597
Plaintiff: Natalie Barnes, Natalie Barnes, Gail Reimoneq and others
Defendant: State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Barnes v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv04603
Plaintiff: Natalie Barnes and Natalie Barnes
Defendant: Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?