Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Piens v. Reckard et al
as 4:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Thola Dean Piens
Defendant:
Dr. Justin Reckard, Dr. Syed F. Azam, Dr. Scott A. Gering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Mesteth v. Mueller et al
as 5:2023cv05040
Plaintiff:
Freeman A. Mesteth
Defendant:
Brian Mueller, Robert Yantis, Dr. Nathan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2022cv05090
Petitioner:
Nathan Chase
Respondent:
Warden Dan Sullivan and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell Hotel LLC et al v. Ramada Worldwide Inc.
as 4:2022cv04115
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Hotel LLC and Nathan Stencil
Defendant:
Ramada Worldwide Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Aga et al v. Meade County et al
as 5:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Aga, Randy Aga, Courtney Ahrendt and others
Defendant:
Meade County, KNAUF KG a German Corporation and United States Gypsum Corporation, (USG Corporation) an Illinois Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Gromer
as 4:2018cv04172
Plaintiff:
Nathan Allen Williams
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Gromer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv04050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
With Horn v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv03004
Plaintiff:
With Horn and Nathan Allen With Horn
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
VanHuss v. Borg
as 5:2016cv05075
Plaintiff:
James D. VanHuss
Defendant:
Nathan Borg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashburn v. Smith et al
as 5:2016cv05063
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ashburn
Defendant:
Lee Smith, Nathan Borg, Austin Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
