Cases 41 - 50 of 300
Wimbush v. Kennedy et al
as 2:2019cv00025
Defendant:
Kathleen Kennedy, Gregory C. Dozier, Nathan Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Therian Wimbush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. JOHNSON et al
as 7:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Commissioner HOMER BRYSON, Capt KRAKE, Capt JAVAKA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Deal et al
as 3:2019cv00014
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Lopez
Defendant:
Ware State Prison and Nathan Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. ALLEN et al
as 7:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
EARNEST CLAYTON
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, KEARINS, HYANNA BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. Obama et al
as 1:2018cv25231
Defendant:
President Obama, Governor Nathan Deal, Governor Sony Purdue and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Nathan Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv05600
Plaintiff:
Cecil Cox and John Gross
Defendant:
Governor Nathan Deal, The State of Georgia and Sheriff Theodore Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Deal
as 1:2018cv05549
Plaintiff:
Matthew Washington
Defendant:
Governor Nathan Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv05243
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Cobb County Superior Court, Christopher Michael Carr and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Roberts et al
as 1:2018cv00197
Defendant:
Mrs. Lisa Mayo, Mrs. Rita K. Lomio, Mr. Stan Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The People of Ta' Al Amooruc Republic et al v. United States Corporation Company 1925 et al
as 3:2018cv01208
Defendant:
Pete Ricketts, Steve Bullock, Doug Burgum and others
Plaintiff:
Tasheka Kefla Bey, Kadeen Aqil Bey, The People of Ta' Al Amooruc Republic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
