Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Rhodes et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00032
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Rhodes, William Rice, Wendell Ritchie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rhodes et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv10544
Plaintiff:
James Rhodes, William Rice, Wendell Ritchie and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Chemdesign Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv15727
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NATHANIEL WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nathaniel Ward v. Campbell, et al
as 15-1591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN CAMPBELL, C/O and DAVID THEUT, 048, Hearing Officer
Nathaniel Ward v. Kathy Kafczynski, et al
as 15-1417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHY KAFCZYNSKI, Law Library Tech.
Ward #240660 v. Marietti et al
as 1:2015cv00295
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ward #240660
Defendant:
William C. Marietti and Nancy A. Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward #240660 v. Campbell et al
as 2:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ward #240660
Defendant:
D. Campbell, V. Olmstead, Unknown Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward #240660 v. Campbell et al
as 2:2015cv00027
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ward #240660
Defendant:
Unknown Campbell and D. Theut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward-El v. Lucky et al
as 1:2015cv10238
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ward-El
Defendant:
James Lucky, Lacy O'Connor, Willie Riley and others
Ward #240660 v. Kafczynski et al
as 2:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ward #240660
Defendant:
Kathy Kafczynski, Kristine Lacount, Unknown Holzmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
