Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Vincent v. National Debt Relief LLC
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Gilda Vincent
Defendant:
National Debt Relief LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
National Debt Relief, LLC v. Season 4, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv07198
Plaintiff:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Defendant:
Season 4, LLC and Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Schopp v. National Debt Relief, LLC
as 4:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
George Kenneth Schopp
Defendant:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Tijerina v. National Debt Relief, LLC
as 5:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
Adam Tijerina
Defendant:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rojas v. Cordoba Legal Group LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03264
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Cordoba Legal Group LLC, National Debt Relief LLC, Alfredo Cordoba and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lentz v. National Debt Relief, LLC
as 1:2021cv00143
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court-Gulfport
Defendant:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Trustee:
United States Trustee
Plaintiff:
Kimberly R. Lentz
Emery v. National Debt Relief, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv03334
Defendant:
NATIONAL DEBT RELIEF, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shayne Emery
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Karestin Thompson v. National Debt Relief, LLC
as 2:2020cv02868
Defendant:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Plaintiff:
Karestin Thompson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Lombardi v. National Debt Relief, LLC
as 1:2020cv01511
Defendant:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lombardi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
