Cases 121 - 130 of 327
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016at00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ellington Jordan v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv02765
Defendant:
Does, Sylvia Lopez, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Ellington Jordan
Li Wang et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2016cv01261
Defendant:
California Coastal Conservancy, California Department of Transportation, California Dept. of Fish and Game and others
Plaintiff:
Li Wang, Hui Xiao, Yuzhou Xu and others
Kathy Vance v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 5:2016cv00271
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kathy Vance
Nancy Bailey v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv10014
Plaintiff:
Nancy Bailey
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Alfonso v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, D/B/A Amtrak et al
as 1:2015at00997
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Alfonso
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, D/B/A Amtrak and DOES 1 to 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Alfonso v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2015cv01891
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Alfonso
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv09369
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Elam et al v. National Mediation Board et al
as 4:2015cv05127
Plaintiff:
Kevin Thompson and Tim Elam
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Brown v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 4:2015cv04647
Plaintiff:
Joyce Loretta Brown
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation , Amtrak Corporation and MV Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
