Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Shane Badding v. David Clouse, et al
as 21-16821
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE BADDING
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID CLOUSE, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Navajo County, Arizona, UNKNOWN PENDERGAST, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the County of Navajo, Arizona, and his official capacity as Sheriff Deputy of the Navajo County Sheriff's Office and UNKNOWN NEWMAN, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the County of Navajo, Arizona, and his official capacity as Sheriff Deputy of the Navajo County Sheriff's Office
Defendant:
COUNTY OF NAVAJO and NAVAJO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Ramsay et al v. Clouse et al
as 3:2021cv08117
Defendant:
Unknown Young, Unknown McCollam, D Yazzie and others
Plaintiff:
Erica Danielle Ramsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Badding v. Clouse et al
as 3:2020cv08315
Defendant:
Navajo County Board of Supervisors, Unknown Pendergast, Navajo, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Badding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarver v. Clouse et al
as 3:2020cv08312
Defendant:
David Clouse, Navajo County Board of Supervisors, Navajo, County of and others
Plaintiff:
William McCarver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navajo Nation et al v. Reagan et al
as 3:2018cv08329
Plaintiff:
Navajo Nation, Dale Smith, Ashley Atene, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Edison J Wauneka, Michele Reagan, Patty Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eden #246262 v. Ducey et al
as 3:2015cv08237
Plaintiff:
Jace F Eden
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, Mark Brnovich, Brad Carlyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wesley Simmons, et al v. Navajo County, et al
as 08-15522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY SIMMONS, husband and SHARON SIMMONS, wife
Defendant - Appellee:
NAVAJO COUNTY, State of Arizona, NAVAJO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, governing board of Navajo County, Arizona, GARY BUTLER, Sheriff of Navajo County and others
Amicus Curiae:
ARIZONA TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION and APACHE COCHISE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
