Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Walker v. Darbouze (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00591
Plaintiff: Neil Walker
Defendant: Jean Darbouze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neil Walker v. Warden, et al
as 17-11946
Petitioner - Appellant: NEIL WALKER
Respondent - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALABAMA and WARDEN
In re: Neil Walker
as 17-11422
Petitioner: In re: NEIL WALKER
Mandamus Respondent: WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Neil Walker v. Walter Myers, et al
as 16-12180
Petitioner - Appellant: NEIL WALKER
Respondent - Appellee: WALTER MYERS, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and STATE OF ALABAMA
Walker II v. USA
as 2:2016cv11324
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Larry O'Neil Walker II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Walker v. Myers et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00202
Plaintiff: Neil Walker
Defendant: Walter Myers, Luther Strange and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Neil Walker
as 16-10586
Petitioner: In re: NEIL WALKER
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Neil Walker v. Warden, et al
as 15-14597
Petitioner - Appellant: NEIL WALKER
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN, STATE OF ALABAMA, ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES and others
Walker v. Davenport et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00658
Plaintiff: Neil Walker
Defendant: Carter F. Davenport, State of Alabama, Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
City of Oklahoma City v. 100 foot wide permanent easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2015cv00275
Defendant: 100 foot wide permanent easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines, Brian Clinton Walker, Michael F Murdock and others
Plaintiff: City of Oklahoma City and Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?