Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Neopost USA, Inc v. Klagholz
as 3:2012cv00326
Plaintiff:
Neopost USA, Inc
Defendant:
Martin C. Klagholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neopost USA, Inc v. Harmon
as 3:2012cv00325
Plaintiff:
Neopost USA, Inc
Defendant:
Daniel J. Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neopost USA, Inc v. Coffman
as 3:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Neopost USA, Inc
Defendant:
John Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mailing and Shipping Systems, Inc. v. Neopost USA Inc.
as 3:2012cv00037
Counter Defendant:
Mailing and Shipping Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mailing and Shipping Systems, Inc.
Counter Plaintiff:
Neopost USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Neopost USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Neopost USA, Inc. v. McCabe
as 3:2011cv01369
Plaintiff:
Neopost USA, Inc
Defendant:
John McCabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neopost USA, Inc. v. Erickson et al (DO NOT FILE DOCUMENTS IN CASE PER FILING #19)
as 8:2011cv00100
Defendant:
Kimberly Erickson and Scott M. Erickson
Plaintiff:
Neopost USA, Inc.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Neopost USA, Inc. v. Whitaker Realty, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02864
Plaintiff:
Neopost USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Whitaker Realty, LLC, Helmet House, Inc. and Michael Lightman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
New York City Employee's Retirement System v. Neopost USA Inc.
as 1:2010cv04604
Defendant:
Neopost USA Inc.
Plaintiff:
New York City Employee's Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
East Bay Law v. Neopost USA Inc.
as 3:2010cv01520
Plaintiff:
East Bay Law
Defendant:
Neopost USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neopost USA, Inc v. Cullinan
as 3:2010cv00430
Plaintiff:
Neopost USA, Inc
Defendant:
Robert Cullinan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
