Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CONDON v. NESTER et al
as 2:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CONDON
Defendant:
GREGORY NESTER and THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY IN THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Saracinaj v. Nationwide Insurance Co. et al
as 3:2021cv00793
Defendant:
Robert Tuscano, Nationwide Insurance Co. doing business as Scottsdale Insurance Co. and Leslie Nester
Plaintiff:
Dano Saracinaj
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LULU SHRINERS v. TOWNSHIP OF WHITEMARSH et al
as 2:2020cv01720
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WHITEMARSH, TOWNSHIP MANAGER, RICHARD MELLOR, JR., DOE DEFENDANT 1-99 and others
Plaintiff:
LULU SHRINERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KENNEDY v. NESTER et al
as 5:2017cv04845
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Defendant:
BRIAN A. NESTER, LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK, BOARD OF TRUSTEES LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GODFREY v. COMMONWEALTH et al
as 2:2012cv05549
Plaintiff:
DERRICK GODFREY
Defendant:
LARRY THOMPSON, C.S. NABER, JULIO M. ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOSA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv49076
Plaintiff:
NESTER SOSA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HAWRAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53520
Plaintiff:
NESTER HAWRAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HAWRAN v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32413
Plaintiff:
NESTER HAWRAN
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NESTER et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv68748
Plaintiff:
RALPH V. NESTER, RALPH V. NESTER, FREEDA M. NESTER and others
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
