Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Arrowpac Incorporated et al v. Sea Star Line, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv01180
Plaintiff:
Universal Container Line, Inc., Payless Shoesource, Inc., Kmart Corporation and others
Defendant:
Leonard Shapiro, Saltchuk Resources, Inc., Sea Star Line, LLC and others
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025
Valle-Rivera et al v. Nestle Puerto Rico, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01788
Plaintiff:
Georgie Valle-Rivera , Janet Falcon-Rivera and Conjugal Partnership Valle-Falcon
Defendant:
Nestle Puerto Rico, Inc. , Nestle Professional and Swirl Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Arrowpac Incorporated et al v. Sea Star Line LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01008
Plaintiff:
Arrowpac Incorporated , Universal Container Line Inc , ATEC Systems LTD and others
Defendant:
Sea Star Line LLC , Saltchuk Resources Inc , Totem Ocean Trailer Express Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Arrowpac Incorporated et al v. Sea Star Line LLC et al
as SC/2:12-cv-01008
Defendant:
Crowley Maritime Corporation , Crowley Liner Services Inc , Sea Star Line LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Arrowpac Incorporated , Universal Container Line Inc , ATEC Systems LTD and others
Sterling Merchandising, Inc. v. Nestle SA, et al
as 10-1925
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STERLING MERCHANDISING, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
NESTLE SA, PAYCO FOODS CORPORATION and NESTLE PUERTO RICO, INC.
Defendant:
NESTLE HOLDINGS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
PR DEPT OF JUSTICE
Interested Party:
PMC MARKETING CORP.
Ortiz Hernandez
as 3:2010cv01527
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ortiz Hernandez , Hemerita Cintron-Cintron , Yesenia Lee Ortiz-Cintron and others
Defendant:
Nestle Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sterling Merchandising, Inc v. Nestle S A et al
as 1:2008mc00005
Plaintiff:
Sterling Merchandising, Inc
Defendant:
Nestle S A, Nestle Puerto Rico, Inc and Payco Foods Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
