Cases 1 - 10 of 31
GS Holistic LLC v. Smoke Net Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
GS Holistics, LLC and GS Holistic LLC
Defendant:
Smoke Net Inc doing business as Redmond Cigars & Tobacco and Mohammed Khan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Aperture Net LLC v. Electric Mirror Inc
as 2:2022cv01548
Plaintiff:
Aperture Net LLC
Defendant:
Electric Mirror Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Aperture Net LLC v. Electric Mirror Inc
as 2:2022cv01533
Plaintiff:
Aperture Net LLC
Defendant:
Electric Mirror, Inc. and Electric Mirror Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Aperture Net LLC v. Synology America Corp
as 2:2021cv00711
Plaintiff:
Aperture Net LLC
Defendant:
Synology America Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Aperture Net LLC v. Logitech Inc
as 3:2021cv05230
Plaintiff:
Aperture Net LLC
Defendant:
Logitech, Inc. and Logitech Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Aperture Net LLC v. WatchGuard Technologies Inc
as 2:2020cv00816
Plaintiff:
Aperture Net LLC
Defendant:
Watchguard Technologies Inc. and WatchGuard Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Aperture Net LLC v. HTC America Inc
as 2:2019cv01746
Defendant:
HTC America, Inc and HTC America Inc
Plaintiff:
Aperture Net LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Tuttle v. Washington & Idaho Railway, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00178
Defendant:
Washington & Idaho Railway, Inc., Midwest Pacific Rail Net & Logistics Co., Midwest Pacific Rail Net & Logistics Co and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Tuttle
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ambi-Net Medical Transportation, LLC v. Regence BlueShield
as 2:2018cv00270
Plaintiff:
Ambi-Net Medical Transportation LLC
Defendant:
Regence BlueShield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.