Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Monaghan v. AT&T Corp et al
as 4:2022cv01335
Plaintiff: Terri Lynn Monaghan
Defendant: AT&T Corp, Calligaris USA Inc, AT&T Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chesapeake Specialty Products, Inc. v. New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
as 1:2020cv02021
Plaintiff: Chesapeake Specialty Products, Inc.
Defendant: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Montgomery v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
as 2:2016cv00109
Plaintiff: Sharon Montgomery
Defendant: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
New Cingular Wireless v. Howard County, Maryland et al.
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility
Defendant: Howard County, Maryland and Howard County Board of Appeals
Cause Of Action: Communications Act of 1934
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Spotsylvania County, Virginia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00351
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Defendant: Spotsylvania County, Virginia and Board of Supervisors of Spotsylvania County, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC et al v. PLATINUM COMMUNICATIONS et al
as 8:2011cv00306
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
Defendant: PLATINUM COMMUNICATIONS, Platinum Unlimited Communications, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Fairfax County Board We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2381
Plaintiff - Appellant: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility
Defendant - Appellee: THE FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Alltel Communications, LLC v. Edward Finley, Jr.
as 10-2243
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Plaintiff: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility, on behalf of itself and its wireless operating affiliates
Defendant - Appellee: EDWARD S. FINLEY, JR., Chairman (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission), WILLIAM T. CULPEPPER, III, Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission), BRYAN E. BEATTY, Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission) and others
Defendant: ROBERT V. OWENS, JR., Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilites Commission) and HOWARD N. LEE, Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utitlies Commission)
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Edward Finley, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2221
Plaintiff - Appellant: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility, on behalf of itself and its wireless operating affiliates and ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Defendant - Appellee: EDWARD S. FINLEY, JR., Chairman (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission), WILLIAM T. CULPEPPER, III, Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission), BRYAN E. BEATTY, Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilities Commission) and others
Defendant: ROBERT V. OWENS, JR., Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utilites Commission) and HOWARD N. LEE, Commissioner (in his official capacity as Commissioner of the North Carolina Utitlies Commission)
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00283
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Defendant: The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332 Telecommuncations Act of 1996

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?