Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rodriguez v. Atlanta National League Baseball Club, LLC, et al
as 5:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Defendant:
Atlanta National League Baseball Club, LLC, Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., '47 Brand, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Gonzalez v. Coalition to Advance the Protection of Sports Logos
as 1:2020cv08730
Plaintiff:
Gary Gonzalez
Defendant:
Coalition to Advance the Protection of Sports Logos doing business as CAPS and New Era Cap Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
God's Era v. New Era Cap Co., Inc.
as 20-1513
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW ERA CAP CO., INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GOD'S ERA
God's Era v. New Era Cap Co., Inc.
as 20-1776
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW ERA CAP CO., INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GOD'S ERA
Coogi Partners LLC v. NBA Properties Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01857
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Frontier Aluminum Corporation, New Era Cap Co., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Coogi Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lopez v. New Era Cap Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11381
Defendant:
Cap City, Inc. and New Era Cap Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Graham v. RWTW, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv06812
Plaintiff:
Shawn Graham
Defendant:
RWTW, LLC, KITH Retail, LLC, New Era Cap Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 112
GOD'S ERA v. NEW ERA CAP CO., INC.
as 1:2018cv11065
Plaintiff:
GOD'S ERA
Defendant:
NEW ERA CAP CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
New Era Cap Co., Inc. v. Already, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
New Era Cap Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Already, LLC and John P McDade
Counter_claimant:
John P McDade and Already, LLC
Counter_defendant:
New Era Cap Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
