Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Yang et al v. New York State Board of Elections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03325
Defendant: New York State Board of Elections
Plaintiff: Jonathan Herzog, Alison Hwang, Hellen Suh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
Liotti v. The Nassau County Board of Elections et. al.
as 2:2019cv04264
Defendant: The Nassau County Republican Committee, The Nassau County Bar Association, The Nassau County Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff: Thomas F. Liotti, Pro Bono Publico Bar Association, Inc. and Thomas F. Liotti, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bal v. Manhattan Democratic Party
as 19-1546
Defendant: Martin Conner, Freda Fried, personally and in the capacity of President, Democratic Party of the County of New York and others
Defendant / Appellee: New York County Democratic Committee, Cathleen McCadden, personally and in the capacity of Executive Director, Keith Wright, personally and in the capacity of County Leader and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Bal, in the capacity as a Democratic Candidate for the New York State Assembly
Frank Heindel v. Marci Andino
as 19-1204
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT MOSELY, Member of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, BILLY WAY, JR., Chair of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, MARCI ANDINO, Executive Director of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANK HEINDEL and PHIL P. LEVENTIS
Amicus Curiae: MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER, Secretary of State for New Mexico, DUNCAN A. BUELL, Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering and NCR Chair of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, JOSEPH R. KINIRY, Principal Scientist, Galois, and Principled CEO and Chief Scientist, Free & Fair and others
McMillan v. New York State Board of Elections
as 1:2018cv05196
Plaintiff: Jimmy McMillan and Jimmy
Defendant: New York State Board of Elections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Merced v. Spano
as 18-2089
Plaintiff: Alex Merced, candidate of the Libertarian Party for the office of United States Senator for the State of New York and Mark E. Glogowski, as Chair and on behalf of the Libertarian Party of New York, an independent body
Plaintiff - Appellee: William Redpath, a Virginia resident and Free Libertarian Party, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: Andrew J. Spano, Gregory P. Peterson, Peter S. Kosinski and others
Upstate Jobs Party v. Kosinski
as 18-1586
Plaintiff - Appellant: Upstate Jobs Party, Martin Babinec and John Bullis
Defendant - Appellee: Peter S. Kosinski, New York State Board of Elections Co-Chair Commissioner, in his official capacity, Douglas A. Kellner, New York State Board of Elections Co-Chair Commissioner, in his official capacity, Andrew J. Spano, New York State Board of Elections Commissioner, in his official capacity and others
New York State Board of Electi v. Murawski
as 17-3600
Petitioner: William Murawski
Respondent: New York State Board of Elections and New York City Campaign Board
New York State Board of Elections v. Murawski et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv06859
Plaintiff: William Murawski
Defendant: New York State Board of Elections , New York City Board of Elections and New York City Campaign Finance Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Davis v. New York State Board of Electi
as 16-3822
Plaintiff - Appellant: Evan A. Davis
Defendant - Appellee: New York State Board of Elections, Peter S. Kosinski, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Board of Elections, Douglas A. Kellner, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Board of Elections and others
Defendant: City John Doe, Officers of the New York City Board of Elections and State John Doe, Officers of the New York State Board of Elections

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?