Cases 1 - 10 of 1,514
Zaslavsky v. Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2367
Plaintiff:
NEAL S. ZASLAVSKY, ATTORNEY, an individual
Defendant:
CONSUMER ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES, a California non-profit corporation, MINH TRI NGUYEN, an individual, IBIERE SECK, an individual and others
United States of America v. Nguyen
as 24-2364
Defendant:
THANH NGUYEN and Poway
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Comeau v. VinFast Auto Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv02750
Plaintiff:
Jeremie Comeau
Defendant:
VinFast Auto Ltd., Le Thi Thu Thuy, Pham Nhat Vuong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 24-2221
Plaintiff:
MAI-TRANG THI NGUYEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nguyen, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-2036
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE NGUYEN, DOMINIC BOGUSKI, JAY MEDINA and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her capacity as the Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
United States of America v. Nguyen
as 8:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sandy Mai Trang Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Egan v. Wei, et al.
as 24-1755
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EGAN
Defendant:
MAGGIE M. WEI, individually, M.D. in her official capcity, TRAN B. LOCKE, individually, M.D. in her official capacity, ALVIN H. NGUYEN, individually, D.O. in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
