Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Willing v. Hutchings, et al.
as 24-205
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS JAMES WILLING
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, Substituted in place of Brian Williams, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and ADAM LAXALT
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR.
Castillo et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 2:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Jesus Castillo, Mark Knowles, Alex Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
R.S., Matt Groves and Vern Deochoa
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Willing v. Fed Judge (RFB) et al
as 2:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Willing
Defendant:
Fed Judge (RFB), Mag Judge (BNW), Fed Judge (APG) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cantrell v. USA
as 3:2022cv01448
Petitioner:
Nicholas James Cantrell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McGuffin v. Oregon State Police et al
as 3:2021cv01719
Defendant:
Oregon State Police and Nicholas James McGuffin
Plaintiff:
S.M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholas James Hanania v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 8:2021cv01530
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Hanania
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Anatoly Sharij v. Nicholas James Vujicic
as 2:2021cv07434
Plaintiff:
ANATOLY SHARIJ
Defendant:
NICHOLAS JAMES VUJICIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Nicholas Imhoff
as 21-30077
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS JAMES IMHOFF
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
