Cases 21 - 30 of 190
Pollard v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv04970
Plaintiff:
Siamone Nicholle Pollard
Defendant:
Cook County Jail and DuPage County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICHOLS v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00321
Petitioner:
JAMES HAROLD NICHOLS
Respondent:
STEVE KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Broomfield v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2022cv50259
Plaintiff:
Henry Broomfield
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Sonya Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. MEDLOCK et al
as 4:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
DAVID JASON TAYLOR
Defendant:
CODY MEDLOCK, FRANK LOOP, CAPTAIN FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNYDER v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv01378
Plaintiff:
DENNIS PATRICK SNYDER
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BRADLEY BURKHART, BRIDGET FOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BESECKER v. LOOP et al
as 4:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY BESECKER
Defendant:
FRANK LOOP, BRANDON REARDON, COLTON MCPHEETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derek Boyd v. Davin Nichols, et al
as 22-2152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEREK L. BOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVIN NICHOLS, DAVID LACY, ROBERT NUNEMACHER and others
Derek Boyd v. Davin Nichols, et al
as 22-2130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEREK L. BOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVIN NICHOLS, DAVID LACY, ROBERT NUNEMACHER and others
Nichols v. People
as 1:2022cv03364
Petitioner:
Rickie T. Nichols
Respondent:
People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Dodd et al
as 3:2022cv01013
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Rachell Dodd, Lance Ellington, J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
