Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Powell v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Nicole Powell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
POWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00281
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL NICOLE POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres v. Dye et al
as 5:2020cv00164
Defendant:
FNU Clawson, FNU Brown, Russell Chester and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Gochie v. Ken Beaver
as 19-6986
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY D. GOCHIE
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNY BOTEAT, Unit Manager, FNU WARDEN, FNU WARD and others
Gary Gochie v. Ken Beaver
as 19-6889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY D. GOCHIE
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC DYE, Assistant Superintendent, Alexander CI, KEN BEAVER, Superintendent, Alexander CI, KENNY BOTEAT, Unit Manager, Alexander CI and others
Defendant:
FNU GREEN
Perez et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12358
Plaintiff:
Gennaro Prudente, Minerva Rodriguez, Chrystal Pierre and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Gochie v. Beaver et al
as 5:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Gochie
Defendant:
Eric Dye, Kenny Boteat, Ken Beaver and others
Gochie v. Beaver et al
as 5:2018cv00128
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Gochie
Defendant:
FNU McFearson, Kenny Boteat, Ken Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael E. Berry v. Equifax Inc., et al
as CAC/8:18-cv-00957
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Berry , Johnny James Deleon , Nicholas Edward Dibs and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc. and Does
Michael E. Berry v. Equifax Inc., et al
as 8:2018cv00957
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Berry, Johnny James Deleon, Nicholas Edward Dibs and others
Defendant:
Does and Equifax Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
