Cases 1 - 6 of 6
ARNOLD v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. ARNOLD, JR.
Defendant:
DANIELLE BRADFORD, TAYLOR BAUGH, JEFFREY PEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA, et al v. One Ezonics Excam Model P35U1, et al
as 12-1869
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
CHARLES A. BURT, Claimant
Defendant:
ONE EZONICS EXCAM MODEL P35U1 USB WEBCAM, Bearing Serial Number 91810U001323, ONE CANNON POWERSHOT A70 DIGITAL CAMERA, Bearing Serial Number 6722228597, ONE NIKON CL30S 24MM LENS, Bearing Serial Number 642839 and others
USA, et al v. One Ezonics Excam Model P35U1, et al
as 11-2997
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
CHARLES A. BURT, Claimant
Defendant:
ONE EZONICS EXCAM MODEL P35U1 USB WEBCAM, Bearing Serial Number 91810U001323, ONE CANNON POWERSHOT A70 DIGITAL CAMERA, Bearing Serial Number 6722228597, ONE NIKON CL30S 24MM LENS and others
Memory Control Enterprise, LLC v. Mizuno USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv05178
Plaintiff:
Memory Control Enterprise, LLC
Defendant:
Mizuno USA, Inc., Nikon Inc. and Sony Electronics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Nikon Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv02510
Plaintiff:
Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG and Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
Defendant:
Nikon Corporation, Nikon Americas, Inc., Nikon Americas, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Nikon, Inc. and Nikon, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG and Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States Of America v. One Ezonics Ezcam Model P35U1 USB Webcam et al
as 1:2007cv03759
Plaintiff:
United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant:
One Ezonics Ezcam Model P35U1 USB Webcam, One Olympus Camedia C 440 Zoom Digital Camera with Flash, One Cannon Powershot A70 Digital Camera and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881 Forfeiture of Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
