Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LIPPINCOTT v. BENNER et al
as 3:2023cv23319
Plaintiff:
RANDY LIPPINCOTT
Defendant:
LAWRENCE EDWARD BENNER, RICHARD NILSON and COLINGTON HARBOUR ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nilson et al v. Walker et al
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
David Mark Nilson and Cherie Nilson
Defendant:
Adam Walker, Dustin Ericson, Tiffany Lannefeld and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fearn v. Graham et al
as 4:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Edgar L. Hurtado, Michael Brown, Michael R Collingwood and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham Fearn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Nicholas et al v. Nilson
as 1:2019cv00125
Plaintiff:
Raechal Nicholas and Jacob Nicholas
Defendant:
Jazmyne Nilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bursztyn et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12026
Plaintiff:
Richard Giordano, Louis Camerada, Anthony Camera and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Bursztyn et al v. Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11891
Plaintiff:
Richard Giordano, Louis Camerada, Anthony Camera and others
Defendant:
Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Escobar et al v. Rennert et al
as 4:2016cv01731
Plaintiff:
Sandra Bertha Acuna Escobar , Jacqueline Magali Acuna Ibaceta , Rosa Marilyn Aguirre Medina and others
Defendant:
The Doe Run Resources Corporation , Marvin K. Kaiser , Albert Bruce Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amy Nilson v. The City of San Jose, et al
as 08-16740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMY NILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY OF SAN JOSE, SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY and others
Nilson v. The City of San Jose et al
as 5:2007cv03686
Plaintiff:
Amy Nilson
Defendant:
The City of San Jose, Santa Clara Valley Water District and San Jose Water Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
