Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Cochran v. Noble Drilling LLC et al
as 2:2018cv07392
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Cochran
Defendant:
Noble Corporation plc, Noble Drilling LLC, Noble Drilling U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Frazier v. Noble Drilling U.S., LLC, et al
as 2:2017cv06784
Plaintiff:
Cody Frazier
Defendant:
Noble Drilling U.S. LLC, Paragon Offshore Drilling LLC, Noble Drilling Exploration Company and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Donica v. Noble Services International Limited et al
as 3:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Toby Donica
Defendant:
Noble Services International Limited, Noble Corporation, Noble Drilling Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. v. Noble Corporation plc et al
as 4:2017cv00123
Plaintiff:
Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc.
Defendant:
Noble Corporation plc, Noble Corporation, Noble Drilling Americas LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Runnels v. Noble Drilling (U.S.) LLC et al
as 4:2016cv02768
Plaintiff:
Harold Runnels
Defendant:
Noble Drilling (U.S.) LLC and Noble Drilling Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Covington v. Noble Drilling (U.S.), LLC
as 2:2016cv12316
Plaintiff:
Donald Covington
Defendant:
Noble Drilling (U.S.), LLC
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Burkeen v. Noble Drilling U.S., LLC
as 2:2016cv07075
Plaintiff:
Shaun Burkeen
Defendant:
Noble Drilling U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Askins v. Hagopian et al
as 4:2016cv01370
Plaintiff:
Daniel Askins
Defendant:
Jeffrey B Hagopian and Noble Drilling (U.S.) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
