Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Rodda et al v. Stoll et al
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Noel Rodda and Bryan Rodda
Defendant:
Bethany Stoll and Schneider National Carriers, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NOEL v. USA
as 1:2023cv02222
Petitioner:
KEVIN NOEL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WITCHER III v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
NOEL W. WITCHER III
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
DAVIS v. OFFICER HARTLEY et al
as 4:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
JERRY T. DAVIS
Defendant:
OFFICER HARTLEY, LT. THOMAS, MAJ. O'LAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
SAWYER v. NUTTER et al
as 4:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT SAWYER
Defendant:
OFFICER NUTTER, BROWN, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REITER et al v. NOEL et al
as 4:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER REITER and TIFFANY NAPIER
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARRID, BRADLEY KRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GARRISON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2022cv01895
Plaintiff:
FRANK GARRISON and NOEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and MIGUEL CARDONA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
NOEL v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01771
Petitioner:
JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Respondent:
INDIANA STATE PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
