Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Noel v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Marcus Noel
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Braley v. Thompson et al
as 2:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
Christopher Noel Braley
Defendant:
Brandon Thompson, John Doe and Jackson County Commission a body politic doing business as Jackson County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Romero Espinal v. Maruka
as 1:2020cv00760
Petitioner:
Noel Romero Espinal
Respondent:
C. Maruka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jordan v. AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center Disability Plan et al
as 3:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Noel Jordan
Defendant:
AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center Disability Plan, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. and Does 1 through 5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mink v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 5:2017cv02212
Plaintiff:
James Mink
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP , MacCorkle Lavender PLLC and Heather Noel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Noel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05760
Plaintiff:
Wanda Noel
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Multi-Chem Group, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00087
Plaintiff:
Johnie Lee Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Multi-Chem Group, LLC and Richard Noel Cerciello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noel v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04122
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Noel
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noel et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv16483
Plaintiff:
Florence Noel and Linda L. Van Natta
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Preuss et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15974
Plaintiff:
Sue Ann Preuss and Noel D. Preuss
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
