Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv30084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Goodnow v. Nolan Associates
as 1:2021cv11122
Plaintiff:
Lois Goodnow
Defendant:
Nolan Associates LLC doing business as Boston Harbor Cruises, as owners of the M/V NATHANIEL BOWDITCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huffman et al v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2021cv10986
Defendant:
Michael Burke, Edward Joseph Nolan, City of Boston and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Chambers-Maher, Caitlyn Hall, Justin Ackers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
V.U.C. et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2021cv10652
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Acting Associate Dir Connie Nolan, Dir. Neb. Serv. Ctr. William Connor and others
Plaintiff:
P. C. C. and V. U. C.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
McGowty v. Nolan Associates, LLC
as 1:2020cv11182
Defendant:
Nolan Associates, LLC, d/b/a Boston Harbor Cruises and Nolan Associates, LLC doing business as Boston Harbor Cruises
Plaintiff:
Scott McGowty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pinto v. Nolan Associates LLC
as 1:2019cv11324
Defendant:
Nolan Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
Arlindo Pinto
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Vasquez v. Correctional Psychiatric Services et al
as 1:2018cv12324
Defendant:
Correctional Psychiatric Services, Joseph McDonald, Melvin Sprague and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Tidwell et al
as 4:2017cv40004
Plaintiff:
Tony Goodman
Defendant:
Tidwell, Grondolsky, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henney v. Nolan Fisheries, Inc.
as 1:2016cv12577
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henney
Defendant:
Nolan Fisheries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
