Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Lorick et al v. A'Viands LLC
as 2:2017cv02585
Plaintiff:
Brian Lorick , Carlus Anderson , Heirbrane Foster and others
Defendant:
A'Viands LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. FCA US LLC et al
as 4:2017cv02300
Plaintiff:
Carl Mark Daniels
Defendant:
FCA US LLC , South Carolina Department of Transportation and Nolan's Service Station
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Henderson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00287
Plaintiff:
Aryee Henderson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P Stirling, Michael McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billups et al v. Charleston, City of
as 2:2016cv00264
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Billups , Michael Warfield and Michael Nolan
Defendant:
Charleston, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickell v. Stirling et al
as 6:2015cv04656
Plaintiff:
Darrell J Mickell
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling , C Reynolds , Mr Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Nadine Smith et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04437
Plaintiff:
Nadine Smith , Carolyn Jones-Hedgepeth , Lita Haman and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , Greenstone LLC , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brooks v. South Carolina Department Corrections et al
as 9:2015cv03692
Plaintiff:
Altony Brooks
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Lee Correctional Institution, Bryan Sterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClellan v. Haley et al
as 9:2015cv02245
Plaintiff:
James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Nikki R Haley and Rick Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pressley v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2015cv01956
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Pressley
Defendant:
C Reynolds, Warden Davis, Warden Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
