Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NORRIS v. CAPE ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2019cv00466
Plaintiff:
SHAEL NORRIS
Defendant:
NATHAN CARPENTER, CAPE ELIZABETH SCHOOL DISTRICT, DONNA WOLFROM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bowles v. Lebanon Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00563
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Bowles
Defendant:
Gerald Brown, Lebanon Police Department, Lebanon, NH, Town of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Pike v. Sebelius, et al
as 15-1890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
F. NORRIS PIKE, ex rel Estate of Claire S. Pike
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of Health and Human Services, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and SOUTH COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL GORMAN, Hearing Officer of Rhode Island Department of Human Services
Drew v. NH Drug Task Force et al
as 1:2014cv00462
Defendant:
Gus Benavides, Scott Dunn, Adam Fanjoy and others
Plaintiff:
Willard Drew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv13780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
