Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. North Texas Tollway Authority
as 4:2020cv00719
Defendant:
North Texas Tollway Authority
Plaintiff:
Derick Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mirna Reyes, et al v. North Texas Tollway Authority
as 16-10767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIRNA REYES, EMMANUEL LEWIS, JENNIFER BUNCH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH TEXAS TOLLWAY AUTHORITY, (NTTA)
Lockett v. North Texas Tollway Authority
as 3:2013cv00882
Plaintiff:
Larry Lockett
Defendant:
North Texas Tollway Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Schulman v. Schulman et al
as 3:2012cv04835
Plaintiff:
Joel A. Schulman
Defendant:
Cheris Theresa Schulman and North Texas Tollway Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Reyes et al v. North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA) et al
as 3:2010cv00868
Plaintiff:
Mirna Reyes and Emmanuel Lewis
Defendant:
North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA) , Paul Wageman , Allen Clemson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
APM & Associates Inc et al v. North Texas Tollway Authority
as 4:2009cv00506
Plaintiff:
APM & Associates Inc and Afisu Olabimtan
Defendant:
North Texas Tollway Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
APM & Associates Inc et al v. North Texas Tollway Authority
as 4:2009cv00159
Plaintiff:
APM & Associates Inc and Afisu Olabimtan
Defendant:
North Texas Tollway Authority and North Texas Tollway Authority
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
