Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Oren et al v. City of Waxahachie, Texas
as 3:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Asher Oren, Gavriel Taub, CTO Estate, LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Waxahachie, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv01956
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00815
Plaintiff:
Monroe, Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
James Nottingham v. Attorney General Pennsylvania
as 21-3298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. NOTTINGHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
James Nottingham v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 20-3423
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. NOTTINGHAM
Nottingham v. Love, et al
as 20-11068
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert A. Love, Casey Timmons, Krista Romero and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay Anthony Nottingham, also known as Jeff Andrew Montgomery
James Nottingham v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 20-2984
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY REITZ, WILLIAM JONES, MATTHEW WELICKOVITCH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. NOTTINGHAM
James Nottingham v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 20-2892
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. NOTTINGHAM
James Nottingham v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 20-2821
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. NOTTINGHAM
ASSUREDPARTNERS OF NEW JERSEY, LLC v. MCCAY BENEFITS, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv07373
Defendant:
NOTTINGHAM AGENCY, INC., PATRICK PANTAGES and MCCAY BENEFITS, LLC
Plaintiff:
ASSUREDPARTNERS OF NEW JERSEY, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
