Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,095
Dixon Jr. et al v. Lammert et al
as 1:2024cv02891
Plaintiff: Temmy L. Dixon Jr., Cirsten M. Nunn and The City of Chicago
Defendant: Timothy M. Lammert and Daniel P. Condreva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brady Spicer v. Wilkes County North Carolina
as 24-6309
Plaintiff: BRADY LEON SPICER
Defendant: JONATHAN CALL, Lieutenant, ROBERT CLAYTON ANDERSON, DEREK ELLIS, Parole Office and others
In re: Cecil
as 24-6059
Petitioner: In re: LARRY D. CECIL
Respondent: SCOTT NUNN
In re: Eckardt
as 24-6058
Petitioner: KYLE RICHARD ECKARDT
Respondent: SCOTT NUNN
Nunn v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01130
Plaintiff: Alexander W Nunn
Defendant: CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. and COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Interested Party: KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 4:2024cv00829
Plaintiff: Anthony Prescott
Defendant: Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Byers et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff: Tommy Radford
Defendant: Jared Byers, J Nunn, Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Nunn v. Keenan
as 2:2024cv00676
Petitioner: Joseph Arthur Nunn
Respondent: Stefanie Keenan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NUNN v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC et al
as 3:2024cv01229
Not Yet Classified: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: BRIANNA L NUNN
Defendant: JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 6:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: Anthony Prescott
Defendant: Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?