Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nutrition & Fitness, Inc. v. King Harvest California
as 8:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
Nutrition & Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
King Harvest California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Progressive EMU Inc., v. Nutrition & Fitness Inc., et al
as 18-10671
Interested Party - Appellant:
ANDERSON WEIDNER LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
NUTRITION & FITNESS INC.
:
SERVICE
Nutrition & Fitness Inc v. Younus
as 3:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
Nutrition & Fitness Inc
Defendant:
Mohammad Younus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Progressive EMU Inc. v. Nutrition & Fitness Inc.
as 14-13486
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE EMU INC., f.k.a. Johnson EMU Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
NUTRITION & FITNESS INC.
Progressive EMU Inc. v. Nutrition & Fitness, Inc.
as 14-13485
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE EMU INC., f.k.a. Johnson EMU Inc.
Defendant - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
NUTRITION & FITNESS, INC.
Nutrition & Fitness, Inc. v. Progressive Emu, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02805
Plaintiff:
Nutrition & Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
Progressive Emu, Inc. and Chris Binkley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nutrition & Fitness, Inc. v. Progressive Emu, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Nutrition & Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
Progressive Emu, Inc. and Chris Binkley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Progressive EMU Inc v. Nutrition & Fitness Inc
as 2:2012cv01079
Plaintiff:
Progressive EMU Inc
Defendant:
Nutrition & Fitness Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Nutrition & Fitness, Inc. v. The Winning Combination Inc.
as 5:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
Nutrition & Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
The Winning Combination Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Cowsert v. Nurtition & Fitness, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00484
Plaintiff:
Katherine Cowsert
Defendant:
Nutrition & Fitness, Inc., Vitaquest International LLC, NFI Consumer Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.