Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Crawford v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Crawford
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Osauski et al
as 3:2023cv01165
Plaintiff:
Paul M. Miller
Defendant:
Brett Osauski, George Nye, Timothy Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Nye et al
as 4:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Wheeler
Defendant:
Warden Nye, Deputy Warden Burns and Head Nurse Lottie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lapp v. Nye et al
as 1:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Katie F. Lapp
Defendant:
George Nye, Tim Burns, LT. McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NYE v. KLEMM et al
as 1:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
RYAN NYE
Defendant:
REV. ULLI KLEMM, FORMER HEAD CHAPLAIN L. HAFEL, DIETARY SUPERVISOR TROUT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
JohnJuan White
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galutia et al v. County et al
as 1:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Dannelle Galutia
Defendant:
Columbia County, George Nye, Officer Lorson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster, III v. Nye et al
as 4:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
William Henry Foster, III
Defendant:
George Nye, David Setzer and Bradley Hipps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, BERNADETTE MASON, CHARLES STETLLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVERETTS v. BAPTIST et al
as 2:2021cv01047
Plaintiff:
SHANE ALBERT EVERETTS
Defendant:
JUSTIN BAPTIST, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
