Cases 1 - 10 of 15
CHRISTIE v. KUTA et al
as 3:2018cv00050
Petitioner:
OSMOND O'NEIL CHRISTIE
Respondent:
S. M. KUTA and GEO GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. O'NEIL
as 1:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TAMMY L. O'NEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
BROWN v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2017cv01053
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BROWN
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON, PSYCOLOGY DEPARTMENT, OLIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEHANNA v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
MELISSA BEHANNA
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ORLANDO HARPER, LATOYA WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE v. REBER et al
as 2:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
JOSHUA T. REBER, ANTHONY J. BERGER , CHARLES L. CLAYPOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE 1 v. REBER et al
as 2:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1
Defendant:
JOSHUA T. REBER, ANTHONY J. BERGER , CHARLES L. CLAYPOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NGUYEN v. MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05172
Plaintiff:
THANG NGUYEN
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH AMERICA, INC. , O'NEIL NISSAN and CHERRY HILL TRIPLEX
Cross_claimant:
O'NEIL NISSAN
Cross_defendant:
CHERRY HILL TRIPLEX and MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06370
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06153
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicu:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02124
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
