Cases 1 - 10 of 47
O'NEILL, BRAGG & STAFFIN, P.C. et al v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv02109
Plaintiff:
O'NEILL, BRAGG & STAFFIN, P.C. , GARY L. BRAGG and ALVIN M. STAFFIN
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'NEILL v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2017cv05589
Plaintiff:
ALMA O'NEILL
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOMAR v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01035
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR BOMAR
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , JOHN E. WETZEL , ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.H. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv03520
Plaintiff:
J.H.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , THOMAS O'NEILL, RICHARD ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REPPERT v. EMPIRE BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 5:2017cv02992
Plaintiff:
JARED REPPERT
Defendant:
EMPIRE BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. and HARRY J. O'NEILL, IV
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BARTOL v. BARROWCLOUGH et al
as 2:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BARTOL
Defendant:
ADAM BARROWCLOUGH , SHAWN RYAN , ANDREW O'NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'NEILL v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv05899
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH O'NEILL, JR.
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CHALLENGER v. EMPIRE BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 5:2016cv05040
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT CHALLENGER
Defendant:
EMPIRE BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. , HARRY J. O'NEILL, IV and MELINDA O'NEILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'NEILL v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2016cv04003
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BRIAN O'NEILL, JR.
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
