Cases 1 - 10 of 158
Fathmath v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 3:2023cv03626
Plaintiff:
Isha Fathmath
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.P.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Luxottica Group SPA et al v. The Store on Thor LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group SPA and Oakley Inc
Defendant:
Store on Thor LLC, Danielle Cossey, Robert Cossey and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Luxottica Group S.p.A, et al v. Semere & Gideon d/b/a South Hill Market et al
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A,, Oakley Inc., Luxottica Group SPA and others
Defendant:
Semere & Gideon d/b/a South Hill Market, Gideon Tesfa and Ogbai Tesfa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00777
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Oakley Inc v. JMM Lee Properties, LLC
as 8:2019cv01727
Plaintiff:
Oakley Inc
Defendant:
JMM LEE PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Oakley, Inc. v. GNDJI LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00313
Defendant:
Karnail Singh, GNDJI LLC and Singh Karnail
Plaintiff:
Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sawyers Supplies, LLC v. Oakley, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00977
Defendant:
Oakley, Inc. and DOES 1-10 Inclusive
Plaintiff:
Sawyers Supplies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oakley, Inc. v. Elite Tek et al
as 3:2018cv02609
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Bill Scheonborn and Elite Tek
Plaintiff:
Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Oakley, Inc. v. Grangeville Depot LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00502
Defendant:
Grangeville Depot LLC and Rajan Chahal
Plaintiff:
Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
