Cases 1 - 10 of 30
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
STACY SMITH
Defendant:
LISA ARMSTRONG, OFFICER COUCH, MEGAN OLSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Temores v. City of Hammond et al
as 2:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
Antonio Temores
Defendant:
City of Hammond, Chief of Police William Short, Officer D A Hornyak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOHLSEN v. GEIST PATROL, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv02283
Defendant:
OFFICERS JOHN DOE 1-30 and GEIST PATROL, INC.
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BOHLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTFIELD et al v. SIMPSON et al
as 1:2020cv01747
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE 3, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, OFFICER JOHN DOE 4 and others
Plaintiff:
IVORE WESTFIELD and RACHEL HARDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIMBROUGH v. CITY OF KOKOMO TRASH REMOVAL et al
as 1:2020cv01186
Defendant:
Alex Harper, Officer John Doe, City of Kokomo Trash Removal and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. KIMBROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRY v. CITY OF MUNCIE et al
as 1:2019cv03594
Plaintiff:
DANNY TERRY
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, CITY OF MUNCIE and MATTHEW HOLLANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRY v. CITY OF MUNCIE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv01422
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE OFFICERS 2-50, POLICE CHIEF JOSEPH WINKLE and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00995
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DAUGHTRY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
