Cases 31 - 40 of 1,376
Phillip Jacobs v. Marion Correctional Institution, et al
as 24-3092
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP DOUGLAS JACOBS
Defendant:
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY and others
Oh v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Bamm Oh
Defendant:
Quiros, Jane Doe, Mike T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Oh v. Department of Justice
as 6:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Justin Yeol Oh
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odraye Jones v. Ashtabula County, OH, et al
as 24-3063
Plaintiff:
ODRAYE G. JONES, nka Malik Allah-U-Akbar
Defendant:
ASHTABULA COUNTY, OH, CITY OF ASHTABULA, OH, ASHTABULA COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Christopher Williams v. Pavan Parikh, et al
as 24-3059
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PAVAN PARIKH, Hamilton County Clerk of Court and HAMILTON COUNTY, OH CLERK OF COURTS, All Clerk Staff
David Gipson v. Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, et al
as 24-3049
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIPSON
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, HAMILTON COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CHARMAINE MCGUFFEY and others
Westlake Corporation et al v. ChemCorp 1 LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Westlake Corporation and Westlake Chemicals & Vinyls LLC
Defendant:
CHEMCORP 1 LLC, OH YES PLASTICS LLC, ASSIM ALABED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Kenneth Chloe v. Ottawa County OH, Clerk of Courts, et al
as 24-3019
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ANTOINE CHLOE
Defendant:
OTTAWA COUNTY OH, CLERK OF COURTS, KATELYN RITZLER, Court Administrator, BRUCE ALAN WINTERS, Ottawa County Associate Judge and others
Oh v. Department of Justice
as 6:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Justin Yeol Oh
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
