Cases 1 - 10 of 20
TATE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO TATE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Other:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
TATE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv04566
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO TATE and THE ESTATE OF NANCY TATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Marcus Tate
as 18-11483
Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS ORLANDO TATE, a.k.a. Marcus O. Tate-El-Bey-Tey-Washitaw
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marcus Tate v. Alabama Board of Pardons
as 17-12173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS ORLANDO TATE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Tate v. U.S. Eleventh Circuit Judges, et al
as 17-10186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS ORLANDO TATE, a.k.a. Dreliyah Yoshua Mohammed-El-Bey-Tey-Washitaw
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUDGES, U.S. ELEVENTH CIRCUIT CLERKS, PARALEGAL TEAM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00856
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Alabama President Pro Tempore (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00721
Plaintiff:
Marcus Orlando Tate
Defendant:
Alabama President Pro Tempore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Moore et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00478
Plaintiff:
Marcus Orlando Tate
Defendant:
Roy Moore and Julia Jordan Weller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
