Cases 1 - 10 of 218
Fountain v. Rupert
as 24-40267
Plaintiff:
Freddie Fountain, and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
John Rupert, Warden, Coffield Unit, Brian Collier, Executive Director, Jeffrey Richardson, Assistant Warden and others
Kyle Dalen v. Jodi Harpstead
as 24-1498
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jerome Dalen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, in her individual and official capacities
Kenneth Daywitt, et al v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 24-1138
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daywitt, David James Jannetta, Steven Merrill Hogy and others
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, DHS Commissioner; in their individual and official capacities, Marshall Smith, in their individual and official capacities, Nancy Johnston, in their individual and official capacities and others
J. B. v. Sandra Harwood
as 24-3024
Plaintiff:
J. B., a minor, by her father and next friend and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
HONORABLE SANDRA STABILE HARWOOD, in her official capacity as the Administrative Judge of the Trumbull County Common Pleas Court, Juvenile Division
Jeremy Mount v. J. Fikes, et al
as 24-1047
Plaintiff:
Jeremy David Mount, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Warden J. Fikes, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of FCI Sandstone of PINE County, D. Drilling, individually and in his official capacities as correctional officer for the mail room of FCI-Sandstone PINE county and J. Best, individually and in his official capacities as Correctional Officer of FCI-Sandstone Mail Room of PINE County
Parker v. Hooper
as 23-30825
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kentrell Parker, on behalf of themselves and all others similary situated, Farrell Sampier, on behalf of themselves and all others similary situated, Reginald George and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, in his official capacity, Ashli Oliveaux, Assistant Warden for Health Services, in her official capacity, James M. LeBlanc, Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, in his official capacity and others
David Rudometkin, et al v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 23-5218
Plaintiff / Appellee:
David J. Rudometkin, Corry P. Brooks and Robert L. Barnett, III, and others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alexander L. Driskill
Defendant / Appellee:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, in his capacity as the Secretary of Defense
Smith v. Edwards
as 23-30634
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Molly Smith, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, real party in interest Alex A. and Kenione Rogers, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, real party in interest, Brian B., real party in interest, Charles C.
Defendant / Appellant:
John Bel Edwards, Governor; in his official capacity as Governor of Louisiana, William Sommers, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of the Office of Juvenile Justice and James M. LeBlanc, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections
Timothy Olmos v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 23-15892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS, named as Timothy Olmos, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L RYAN, named as Charles Ryan, RICHARD PRATT, MARK SHIPMAN and others
Ledbetter v. Relig Pract Cmte
as 23-10612
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenric Ledbetter, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Isaac Cardenas, ndividually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Santhy Inthalangsy, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Religious Practice Committee, Individually and in his or her official capacity, Timothy Jones, TDCJ Director of Chaplaincy; Individually and in his or her official capacity, Thomas Brouwer, TDCJ Assistant Director of Chaplaincy; Individually and in his or her official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
