Cases 21 - 30 of 236
TRAINOR v. SUPT. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2020cv00260
Defendant:
RICHARD DIBELLA, C.O. YO-YO, C.O. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
VASQUEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Lt. DAVIS, DEREK F. OBERLANDER, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MORALES VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
ANGLE v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00371
Defendant:
DARIK OBERLANDER, MICHEAL OVERMYER, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARNES v. MEDVA et al
as 3:2019cv00202
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET SECURITY DEPT., LT. LINDSEY, CO GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DANTE BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HARPER v. DOE et al
as 1:2019cv00333
Defendant:
MELISSA M. PETERSON, DORINA VARNER, DERRICK F. OBERLANDER and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY CHARLES HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CARSON v WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00119
Defendant:
ANDREW LESLIE, KIM SMITH, DR. J.J.Z. HOLDREN and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. CARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
REGAN v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2019cv01502
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
VASEN REGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. OVERMYER et al
as 5:2019cv01386
Petitioner:
DONALD WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SELDON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00090
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE SELDON
Defendant:
DR. SUTHERLAND, JOHN DOE LEE, ROBERT MAXA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ATANACIO-REYES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv00275
Defendant:
SKILMAN, Lt. DICKEY, SCOTT RIDDLE and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ATANACIO-REYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
