Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Consolidation Coal Company v. PCS Phosphate Company, Incorpo
as 13-1666
Plaintiff:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY, BABSON COLLEGE and others
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. v. PCS Phosphate Company, Incorpo
as 13-1664
Plaintiff:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellant:
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
BARNES & POWELL ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC., TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC and others
Consolidation Coal Company v. Georgia Power Company
as 13-1617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
Third Party Plaintiff:
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY, BABSON COLLEGE and others
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. v. Consolidation Coal Company
as 13-1603
Plaintiff:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., Progress Energy Carolinas, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellant:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
BARNES & POWELL ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC., TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC and others
In Re: Peter AT Sartin
as 10-1177
Appellant:
In re: PETER AT SARTIN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY, OWEN ELECTRIC STEEL COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INCORPORATED and TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, as subrogee of Commercial Metals Company
Defendant - None:
TAMINI TRASFORMATORI SRL
In Re: Peter AT Sartin
as 10-1045
Appellant:
In re: PETER AT SARTIN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY, OWEN ELECTRIC STEEL COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INCORPORATED and TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, as subrogee of Commercial Metals Company
Defendant - None:
TAMINI TRASFORMATORI SRL
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2008cv00460
Defendant:
Tennessee Associated Electric, Inc. or Tennessee Associated Electric, Union Electric Company, American Electric Corporation and others
Special Master:
David O Ledbetter and Mr. David Oscar Ledbetter
Petitioner:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Barnes & Powell Electrical Company, Inc., Trinity Industries, Inc., Georgia-Pacific, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Cross Claimant:
Owen Electric Steel Company of South Carolina and/or SMI-Owen Steel Company, Inc. and/or SMI Steel
Counter Claimant:
Ohio Valley Medical Center, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Travelers Indemnity Company et al v. Tamini Transformatori SRL
as 2:2007cv08236
Plaintiff:
Travelers Indemnity Company, Commercial Metals Company and Owen Electric Steel Company of South Carolina
Defendant:
Tamini Transformatori SRL
Movant:
Peter A T Sartin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
