Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Owens v. Haynes et al
as 5:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Owens
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Haynes, Correctional Officer Toney, Correctional Officer Pack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Sayre et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Owen Underwood
Defendant:
D. T. Sayre, N. G. Elbon, T. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Falcon Owens
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Shirk et al
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Owen Daniels
Defendant:
Shirk, Hazelton U.S.P. Medical, Hazelton U.S.P. Compound and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Daniels v. Barber et al
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Owen Daniels
Defendant:
LT Barber, LT Perez, Gabby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Orme v. Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Derek Matthew Orme
Defendant:
Charleston Police Department, City of Charleston, Charleston Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Young
as 5:2021cv00410
Petitioner:
Marcus Xavier Owens
Respondent:
D. L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Underwood, Jr. v. Galotti et al
as 5:2021cv00068
Defendant:
Andrew Galotti, J Carey, Owen Burdette and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Wade Underwood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Aziz et al
as 3:2020cv00155
Defendant:
CO C. Owens, Nurse Senko, P.A. Hoover and others
Plaintiff:
Keenan A. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Hoover et al
as 3:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Nurse Senko, P.A. Hoover, Lt. Abdul Aziz and others
Plaintiff:
Keenan A. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
