Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Diggs v. Gallucci et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Winnie Odette Diggs
Defendant:
Police Chief Neil Gallucci and DMV Director Jean Shiomoto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Peterson v. Dow, et al
as 2:2023cv11401
Plaintiff:
Bradley T. Peterson
Defendant:
John Dow, Jackson, A. Sema and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cyrus v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv04115
Plaintiff:
Odette K. Oliver Cyrus
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Mr. Duane Baldwin, Mr. Douglas Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
White v. Sacramento Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv02211
Plaintiff:
Megan White, Jeronimo Aguilar, Nicollette Jones and others
Defendant:
Sacramento Police Department, The City of Sacramento and Daniel Hahn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez Collazo et al v. Ruiz Feliciano et al
as 3:2021cv01553
Plaintiff:
Odette Lopez Collazo, Maritza Font Ortiz and Verania Crespo Cruz
Defendant:
Wilfredo Ruiz Feliciano, Luis A. Velez, Nancy Laboy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Riegman v. San Mateo County et al
as 4:2020cv09303
Defendant:
Office of the San Mateo County Sheriff, Carlos G. Bolanos, Lillian Tashiro and others
Plaintiff:
Odette Monica Riegman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
